Nichefit
Menu

Fit, not features

A CRM is cut for a shape of team. Find yours.

FreelancerSales teamStartupAgencyNonprofitContractorCut the pattern to the teamOff the sheet

Nichefit compares sales CRMs by the team each one was built around, not by feature count — and says plainly which teams should buy something else entirely.

Prices read at source

What this site does differently

Most CRM comparisons rank software against software and produce a winner. Nichefit ranks software against teams: how many people need access, what object the business actually tracks, and what the cheapest seat costs to hold indefinitely rather than for the first three months.

That produces different answers for a two-person consultancy, a fifteen-person agency and a charity with forty volunteers — and, quite often, the answer that no sales CRM fits and you should buy a different category of software. Four notes here reach exactly that conclusion, including on pages where saying so costs us a commission.

Where to start

How the figures get here

Every price on this site was read off the vendor's own pricing page on 24 September 2026, in a headless browser configured as a visitor from the United States, with each billing panel opened separately and read out of the rendered page. Eight of those pages open on their annual panel and headline the annual rate.

Nothing here has been tested and nothing is scored out of ten. What a vendor does not publish is written as not published — and where a vendor's own two panels contradict the saving it advertises, the gap is printed rather than resolved. The full record, including what could not be read at all, is in this site's facts file and summarised on the about page.

From the cutting room

Every fitting note →

Before you pick a pattern

What makes a CRM a sales CRM rather than just a CRM?
A sales CRM is built around a deal moving through stages, so its home screen is a pipeline and its reporting answers "what will close, and when". A general CRM is built around a contact record, and a marketing platform is built around a list. The distinction matters because it decides what is cheap and what is painful: putting a pipeline on a contact database is easy, and getting a pipeline tool to behave like a job scheduler or a donor database is not. The ranking sorts the tools by which of those shapes they were cut for.
Is a free CRM ever the right answer?
Often, and for more than a trial. HubSpot's free tools are listed on its own pricing page as free for up to two users with no card, and Zoho CRM's free edition is free for three users — for a solo practice or a founding pair, either can be the finished answer rather than a stepping stone. Nichefit earns nothing on a free signup from either of them: both programmes pay on paid plans only, and that is said on the pages that recommend them.
When should I buy an industry-specific tool instead of a CRM?
When the thing your business tracks is not a deal. A charity tracks a giving history, a trade crew tracks a job with a crew and a site visit attached, a recruiter tracks a candidate who is also a product, and an insurance desk tracks a policy with renewal dates and commission attached. A general CRM can hold all of those as custom fields, and it will hold them badly, because none of its reports are about them. The tell is simple: if you are about to rebuild the vendor's core object out of custom fields, you are buying the wrong category.
Why does Nichefit compare the price of one seat rather than the total bill?
Because the per-seat rate is the number that decides whether a tool fits a shape of team, and the total is arithmetic anyone can do once they know it. The figures on this site are each vendor's cheapest standing rate — the one a team can hold indefinitely — never an introductory offer. Where a vendor publishes an offer price without publishing what it renews at, this site uses the list price and says why. What a five-person bill comes to across the whole market is a different question, outside this site's scope.
Has Nichefit tested these CRMs?
No, and nothing on this site is scored out of ten. Every figure here was read off the vendor's own published pages on one day, in a browser configured as a United States visitor, and the page that prints a figure names the page it came from. Judgements about fit are arguments from those published facts — what a plan includes, what it costs to hold, what the vendor's own object model is built around — not from a bench test that did not happen.